Feb. 2nd, 2005

http://www.metrotimes.com/editorial/story.asp?id=7263

Edited to add: I think this is a very positive article. Yes, it focuses on the parties and the costumes, and makes some minor errors (astrologer<>astronomer) - but it makes the convention sound like it was *fun* and that's the kind of coverage that we want. So please - no more letters to the editor complaining! You should see the stuff that gets written about other conventions - this is really good!

Profile

tammylc

April 2010

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25 2627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 19th, 2017 07:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios